Of the propriety of slash

First things first: everything's ok now. The situation is under control, the criminals have called off the attacks and riots, and negotiation is already taking place. Even had classes today - and attended them. =] Thank you dearies for the hugs.

---

*sighs* Why is it that someone just has to bitch about slash every once in a while? Oh yeah right, to stir a discussion. I must admit, though, that what's on the post she refers to, the "legal aspects", are at least a bit new in terms of complaints. Usually we just get the good ol' "ur eeebil!!!11one!! burn in hell for writing hotmensex u pervs". Speaking of which, our campaign to make hotmensex a LJ interest hasn't been very active lately... I've even made a few icons to try and expand the luff ;]

1	2	3

Back to the matter at hand. The main points addressed on that post are:

a. Whether or not the celebrities portrayed in RPS consented to the use of their names and images, and how that should be addressed legally

b. What sort of measures were taken to restrict access to slash content in websites, and in particular here at LJ.

My thoughts, honestly, are first and foremost: "oh for heaven's sake, mind your own effing slash-less lives, will you."

( Expanding on that )

What's fundamentally wrong with these people? There's no slash in their colourless, dull little lives. ;] What's wrong with me? I let myself be annoyed.